Like, the whole point of Brandless (RIP, I guess, according to that one article) was to, like, *not* have a brand. To cut out all the fancy packaging and marketing fluff and just give you, like, decent charcoal face wash or whatever without the inflated price tag. Remember that whole “consumer-activist movement” thing? Yeah, good times.
And then you slap “Dolce & Gabbana” on it? Talk about a total 180! Like, D&G is *all* about the brand. It’s about the glitz, the glam, the whole “look at me, I’m dripping in designer” vibe. It’s the *opposite* of minimalist, conscious consumerism. This makes no sense!
I saw that one article mention Brandless starting with “genéricos de consumo básico.” That’s so true! Like, who needs a fancy label on their olive oil? I just want it to taste good! But Dolce & Gabbana, they are not about generic.
So, imagine this: a Brandless Dolce & Gabbana lipstick. Would it come in a plain white tube? Would the formula be… okay, but nothing special? Would it cost, like, $5? And would it *actually* be made by Dolce & Gabbana, or just slapped with their (unbranded?) logo?
Honestly, the mind boggles. It’s almost like a philosophical paradox. Like, if a tree falls in the forest and no one’s there to see it, does it still have a brand name? You know?